What is one effective way to engage authors who have not critiqued a publication?

Engaging authors who have not critiqued a publication can be accomplished effectively by targeting specific questions to individual authors during the draft revisions. This approach is beneficial because it invites personalized input and demonstrates that their unique expertise and perspectives are valued. By framing questions that relate to each author's contributions or areas of expertise, you promote a sense of ownership and encourage more meaningful feedback. This tailored engagement can lead to constructive critiques that enhance the overall quality of the publication, as it fosters an environment of collaboration and open dialogue.

In contrast, sending generic feedback to all authors does not encourage specific engagement or make them feel individually valued, potentially resulting in minimal responses. Issuing a public request for feedback could lead to uncertain responses and may not facilitate the targeted insight needed for meaningful improvements. Waiting until the final publication leaves little room for input and can reduce the opportunity for collaborative enhancement that benefits the work before it is finalized.