Which dimension is NOT typically considered when evaluating a journal?

When evaluating a journal, the dimension of author experience is not typically considered in the same way as other metrics. The emphasis when assessing a journal usually revolves around its operational and academic metrics, such as publication lead times, acceptance rates, and society affiliation, which give insights into the journal's efficiency, rigor, and relevance within the academic community.

Publication lead times refer to how long it takes for an article to go from submission to publication, which is a critical factor for authors considering where to submit their work. A lengthy lead time might deter submissions and indicate inefficiencies in the journal's processes.

Acceptance rate is a crucial metric that reflects the journal's selectivity and can influence an author's decision to submit their work there. A lower acceptance rate might be perceived as a mark of prestige, while a higher rate may suggest easier entry but possibly less impact.

Society affiliation signifies the journal's credibility and the community it serves, often linking it to specific research fields and institutional support. These affiliations can enhance the journal's reputation and attract submissions from authors aligned with the society's focus.

In contrast, author experience is a more subjective measure and does not directly relate to the journal itself but rather to individual authors' backgrounds and their previous publication endeavors. While the experience